• After many months of assault on voting rights in states around the country, it was nice to get good news this week with two important wins for voters in Wisconsin and Texas. Voters in these two states woke up today knowing that they will all be able to vote and have their votes counted in the upcoming elections. 

  • Washington, DC (March 13, 2012) - “After many months of assault on voting rights in states around the country, the League of Women Voters (LWV) lauds two decisions on Monday that will protect all eligible voters in Wisconsin and Texas and ensure that they are able to vote and have their votes counted in the upcoming elections,” said Elisabeth MacNamara, President of the League of Women Voters of the United States. “These decisions are important statements about efforts that could impact eligible voters in many others states.”

    A decision was announced yesterday in a case brought by the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin in the Dane County 9th Circuit Court in Wisconsin that granted a permanent injunction against implementation of the nation’s most restrictive voter photo ID law. Judge Richard Niess eloquently stated the potential danger to our democracy in these laws in his decision when he wrote, ‘The defendants’ argument that the fundamental right to vote must yield to legislative fiat turns our constitutional scheme of democratic government squarely on its head.’

    “We are proud of our work to fight back against this undemocratic law and defend voters’ rights. It has been creditably determined that 220,000 Wisconsin citizens could be disenfranchised by this draconian law. We are aware that the judge’s ruling will be appealed but are confident that we will prevail,” said Melanie Ramey, President of the LWV of Wisconsin.

    “Yesterday was also a landmark day because the Department of Justice (DOJ) denied Texas preclearance of their voter photo ID law,” said MacNamara. “The statistics provided by the state of Texas unequivocally establish the discriminatory impact of the law,” added MacNamara.

    “When faced with statistics showing the disproportionate impact on Hispanic voters, the DOJ was left no option except to strike down the law,” said Karen Nicholson, President of the League of Women Voters of Texas. The statistics showed Hispanic registered voters are at least 46.5% (potentially as high as 120%) more likely than non-Hispanic registered voters to lack one of the photo IDs that would have been required to vote under the Texas law. LWV of Texas was instrumental in urging the DOJ to deny preclearance of this law.

    The DOJ also pointed to the cost of underlying documentation needed to get the identification and lack of access to state facilities where voters can get their IDs. “Now is not the time for this country to return to the days of poll taxes limiting access to the polling booth for eligible voters. The DOJ acted in the best interest of the nation in denying preclearance of the law,” said MacNamara.

    “The League of Women Voters has fought for voting rights for all citizens for the past 92 years and will continue the fight as long as this most fundamental right is under attack,” MacNamara stated. “We are hopeful that the wave of voter suppression laws will be struck down in each and every state and come November every eligible citizen will be able to exercise their right to vote and have their vote counted without additional, unnecessary barriers. We stand ready to continue to fight should these decisions be appealed,” concluded MacNamara.

    Contact: Kelly Ceballos, 202-263-1331 or kceballos@lwv.org

  •  
  • Today, a Dane County Circuit Court Judge found the Wisconsin voter ID law unconstitutional. The case, brought by the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, is a big win for all Wisconsin voters. “Voting is not like cashing a check or getting on an airplane. Those activities are not protected by the constitution. Voting is one way in which all citizens are equal, and that is worth fighting for," Melanie Ramey, state president. Read the full statement here.

  • As you know, 10 states hold their presidential primary or caucus elections tomorrow. And the League wants you, and your friends and family, to have the information you need when you go to the polls.

    The League has you covered: visit www.VOTE411.org, the nation’s premier online election resource. 

  • A new article came out yesterday in Ms. Magazine and a few other publications, called Blocking the Vote. The piece, like other recent news stories, details what the League and other voting rights groups have been ringing the alarm bells on for several years - a new wave of voter suppression laws passing state legislatures at an alarming rate.  League President MacNamara's quote sums it up nicely, "The fact that this is being touted as a way of making the [election] system more secure....is just a false argument."

  • In previous years, Amanda Wolf of Sumter, SC, voted using her Florida student photo ID. But the new South Carolina voter ID law changed that. Amanda had to wait more than 6 months to get the proper papers to qualify for a photo ID. Luckily, she received free help from a retired judge since attorneys can charge $1800.

  • by Michael J. Malbin The thirty-year-old system for funding presidential nomination contests that seemed to work well for 20 years is now failing. This year, both major parties’ nominees rejected public matching funds; the legal ceilings for campaign spending are simply too low and inflexible. In addition, the public funding formula has failed to empower average donors, and the Presidential Election Campaign Fund cannot make timely payments because not enough people check the box on their income tax forms to pay for the program. Those who believe the system is worth saving should start thinking about the alternatives, soon.
  • This February 14th is extra sweet because it is our 92nd birthday – so join us on our Facebook page, Twitter feed or in the comments section to leave us a birthday wish. 

  • This week, the League of Women Voters of South Carolina stood with allies to oppose a bill seeking to impose new requirements on independent groups that register voters. The proposal is strikingly similar to a Florida elections law passed last year that, among other things, placed onerous restrictions on voter registration efforts, and led the League of Women Voters to stop registration activities in Florida. Recent research has indicated that the Florida law has already dampened voter registration rates in the state. Barbara Zia, president of the South Carolina League of Women Voters, said the League opposes both bills and is particularly concerned about new rules for voter registration drives in South Carolina, which include fines of up to $1,000 for groups:  "It's going to make it difficult or virtually impossible for the League of Women Voters to continue to register voters in South Carolina," she said. "The effect would be to suppress the vote."

Pages