What’s Happening with Alabama’s Redistricting Post-Milligan? (Blog)
In an unexpected decision last June, Allen v. Milligan, the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) upheld Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) and…, Soon after the congressional map was passed in 2021, several voters and voting rights organizations sued. After an extensive presentation of evidence…, The Supreme Court heard oral argument on October 4, 2022. Voting rights advocates and experts feared the Supreme Court would further weaken the VRA…, The district court noted, “[w]e are deeply troubled that the State enacted a map that the State readily admits does not provide the remedy we said…, In its brief, Alabama argued that the district court ruling striking down its new plan “commanded that race come first and all other criteria come…, The entire debacle, however, was enabled by the Supreme Court’s gutting of Section 5 of the VRA in the 2013 case Shelby v. Holder. If Section 5 were…, The three plans each address the Section 2 violations found in the two prior maps drawn by the Alabama legislature. They each contained two…, Alabamians and voting rights advocates such as US Representative Terri Sewell, the ACLU of Alabama, the National Redistricting Foundation, and former…, The viability of Section 2 has been reaffirmed; however, there are other cases to keep an eye on as states attempt to draw illegal districts that…